Zermatt is the stronger all-round pick here — it offers more vertical than St. Anton am Arlberg. That said, St. Anton am Arlberg is no slouch, and beginners may prefer what it offers. For most holiday skiers, Zermatt delivers more mountain for your trip.
Highlighted cells indicate the stronger result for each metric. Numbers are measurements — compare them directly.
| Zermatt | St. Anton am Arlberg | |
|---|---|---|
Vertical Drop Height from top to bottom — more is a longer, bigger mountain feeling | 2,278m (7,474ft) | 1,300m (4,265ft) |
Summit Elevation How high the mountain reaches — higher tends to mean colder, drier snow | 3,883m (12,740ft) | 2,811m (9,222ft) |
Base Elevation Height of the base village — affects snow quality at the bottom of the mountain | 1,605m (5,266ft) | 1,304m (4,278ft) |
Annual Snowfall Average natural snowfall per season — more means better powder odds | 508cm (200in) | 700cm (276in) |
Trail Count Total marked runs — more variety over a week-long trip | 360 | 340 |
Lift Count Total lifts — more lifts typically means shorter queues and better mountain access | 52 | 88 |
Skiable Area Total groomed and patrolled terrain in hectares | 3,600ha (8,896ac) | 305ha (754ac) |
Beginner Terrain Percentage of trails rated beginner — higher means more options for new skiers | 22% | 18% |
Intermediate Terrain Percentage of trails rated intermediate — the core terrain for most holiday skiers | 44% | 38% |
Advanced Terrain Percentage of trails rated advanced or expert — higher means more challenge | 34% | 44% |
Zermatt edges ahead in more categories, though the gap is close. Both are excellent resorts.
Zermatt has significantly more vertical — a full run takes noticeably longer and the mountain feels much bigger.
St. Anton am Arlberg gets a bit more snow on average, giving it a slight edge for powder days.
Both resorts offer a similar proportion of beginner terrain — neither has a meaningful edge for first-timers.
Both resorts are similar in size — you'll have roughly the same amount of terrain to explore.
Zermatt's higher base elevation helps snow stay cold and dry longer — better conditions through the day and into spring.
Zermatt has a comparable amount of beginner-friendly terrain and is a lower-pressure environment for new skiers.
Zermatt wins on the stats that matter most for experienced skiers — more mountain to explore over a full week.
St. Anton am Arlberg gets more snow annually — better odds of fresh powder and better conditions into late season.
Both resorts offer a similar amount of beginner terrain (Zermatt: 22%, St. Anton am Arlberg: 18%), so neither has a clear edge for first-timers. Focus on which resort offers better ski school programs and convenience for your group.
St. Anton am Arlberg gets more snow on average. That translates to better powder days, longer seasons, and more reliable conditions throughout January and February.
Zermatt is the larger mountain by trail count (Zermatt: 360 trails, St. Anton am Arlberg: 340 trails). On a week-long trip, a bigger mountain means more variety and a lower chance of feeling like you've exhausted the terrain.
St. Anton am Arlberg has a higher percentage of expert terrain. If you're an advanced skier who will spend most of your day on black and double-black runs, that extra challenge is worth considering when choosing between these two.
Both Zermatt and St. Anton am Arlberg are similarly suited to families. Look at ski school quality, on-mountain kids' facilities, and accommodation proximity to lifts when making your final decision — those practical factors matter more than raw stats for a family trip.
Other matchups featuring these resorts and their regional peers.