Pats Peak is the stronger all-round pick here. It offers more vertical than Buck Hill. That said, Buck Hill is no slouch, and beginners in particular may prefer what it offers. For most holiday skiers, Pats Peak delivers more mountain for your trip.
Highlighted cells indicate the stronger result for each metric. Numbers are measurements — compare them directly.
| Pats Peak | Buck Hill | |
|---|---|---|
Vertical Drop Height from top to bottom — more is a longer, bigger mountain feeling | 230m (755ft) | 80m (262ft) |
Summit Elevation How high the mountain reaches — higher tends to mean colder, drier snow | 470m (1,542ft) | 369m (1,211ft) |
Base Elevation Height of the base village — affects snow quality at the bottom of the mountain | 240m (787ft) | 289m (948ft) |
Annual Snowfall Average natural snowfall per season — more means better powder odds | 254cm (100in) | 150cm (59in) |
Trail Count Total marked runs — more variety over a week-long trip | 28 | 16 |
Lift Count Total lifts — more lifts typically means shorter queues and better mountain access | 11 | 6 |
Skiable Area Total groomed and patrolled terrain in hectares | 51ha (126ac) | 18ha (44ac) |
Beginner Terrain Percentage of trails rated beginner — higher means more options for new skiers | 30% | 38% |
Intermediate Terrain Percentage of trails rated intermediate — the core terrain for most holiday skiers | 40% | 38% |
Advanced Terrain Percentage of trails rated advanced or expert — higher means more challenge | 30% | 24% |
Pats Peak has a clear edge across most measurable categories. It's the stronger choice for most skiers making this comparison.
Pats Peak has somewhat more vertical drop, giving a slightly longer ride on most runs.
Pats Peak gets substantially more snow each season, a meaningful edge for powder seekers and late-season skiing.
Buck Hill has a slight edge in beginner-friendly terrain, with a bit more dedicated green-run acreage.
Pats Peak is much larger: significantly more trails means more variety and far less chance of skiing the same run twice in a week.
Both resorts sit at similar base elevations, so snow quality and preservation are comparable.
Buck Hill has more dedicated beginner terrain, making it a better fit for first-timers or parents skiing with young kids.
Pats Peak wins on the stats that matter most for experienced skiers: more mountain to explore over a full week.
Pats Peak gets more snow annually, giving better odds of fresh powder and better conditions into late season.
Buck Hill is the better pick for beginners. It dedicates more of its mountain to green runs and easy terrain, which means less time hunting for appropriate slopes and more time building confidence.
Pats Peak gets more snow on average. That translates to better powder days, longer seasons, and more reliable conditions throughout January and February.
Pats Peak is the larger mountain by trail count (Pats Peak: 28 trails, Buck Hill: 16 trails). On a week-long trip, a bigger mountain means more variety and a lower chance of feeling like you've exhausted the terrain.
Pats Peak has a higher percentage of expert terrain. If you're an advanced skier who will spend most of your day on black and double-black runs, that extra challenge is worth considering when choosing between these two.
Buck Hill is generally the better family resort based on its terrain mix. More beginner-friendly slopes means children and less experienced parents have plenty of room to ski without feeling pushed beyond their comfort zone. That said, both resorts have established ski schools, so check current program reviews before booking.
Other matchups featuring these resorts and their regional peers.