Andermatt-Sedrun comes out ahead overall — it offers more vertical than Mont Sainte-Anne. Mont Sainte-Anne still has plenty to offer, especially for intermediate skiers who don't need the biggest mountain. But if you want the fuller experience, Andermatt-Sedrun wins this one.
Highlighted cells indicate the stronger result for each metric. Numbers are measurements — compare them directly.
| Mont Sainte-Anne | Andermatt-Sedrun | |
|---|---|---|
Vertical Drop Height from top to bottom — more is a longer, bigger mountain feeling | 625m (2,051ft) | 1,480m (4,856ft) |
Summit Elevation How high the mountain reaches — higher tends to mean colder, drier snow | 800m (2,625ft) | 2,961m (9,715ft) |
Base Elevation Height of the base village — affects snow quality at the bottom of the mountain | 175m (574ft) | 1,444m (4,738ft) |
Annual Snowfall Average natural snowfall per season — more means better powder odds | 480cm (189in) | 700cm (276in) |
Trail Count Total marked runs — more variety over a week-long trip | 71 | 120 |
Lift Count Total lifts — more lifts typically means shorter queues and better mountain access | 12 | 33 |
Skiable Area Total groomed and patrolled terrain in hectares | 175ha (432ac) | 1,500ha (3,707ac) |
Beginner Terrain Percentage of trails rated beginner — higher means more options for new skiers | 22% | 25% |
Intermediate Terrain Percentage of trails rated intermediate — the core terrain for most holiday skiers | 39% | 50% |
Advanced Terrain Percentage of trails rated advanced or expert — higher means more challenge | 39% | 25% |
Andermatt-Sedrun has a clear edge across most measurable categories. It's the stronger choice for most skiers making this comparison.
Andermatt-Sedrun has significantly more vertical — a full run takes noticeably longer and the mountain feels much bigger.
Andermatt-Sedrun gets substantially more snow each season — a meaningful edge for powder seekers and late-season skiing.
Both resorts offer a similar proportion of beginner terrain — neither has a meaningful edge for first-timers.
Andermatt-Sedrun is much larger — significantly more trails means more variety and far less chance of skiing the same run twice in a week.
Andermatt-Sedrun's higher base elevation helps snow stay cold and dry longer — better conditions through the day and into spring.
Andermatt-Sedrun wins on the stats that matter most for experienced skiers — more mountain to explore over a full week.
Andermatt-Sedrun gets more snow annually — better odds of fresh powder and better conditions into late season.
Both resorts offer a similar amount of beginner terrain (Mont Sainte-Anne: 22%, Andermatt-Sedrun: 25%), so neither has a clear edge for first-timers. Focus on which resort offers better ski school programs and convenience for your group.
Andermatt-Sedrun gets more snow on average. That translates to better powder days, longer seasons, and more reliable conditions throughout January and February.
Andermatt-Sedrun is the larger mountain by trail count (Mont Sainte-Anne: 71 trails, Andermatt-Sedrun: 120 trails). On a week-long trip, a bigger mountain means more variety and a lower chance of feeling like you've exhausted the terrain.
Mont Sainte-Anne has a higher percentage of expert terrain. If you're an advanced skier who will spend most of your day on black and double-black runs, that extra challenge is worth considering when choosing between these two.
Both Mont Sainte-Anne and Andermatt-Sedrun are similarly suited to families. Look at ski school quality, on-mountain kids' facilities, and accommodation proximity to lifts when making your final decision — those practical factors matter more than raw stats for a family trip.
Other matchups featuring these resorts and their regional peers.