Vars comes out ahead overall — it offers more vertical than Mont Orford. Mont Orford still has plenty to offer, especially for intermediate skiers who don't need the biggest mountain. But if you want the fuller experience, Vars wins this one.
Highlighted cells indicate the stronger result for each metric. Numbers are measurements — compare them directly.
| Mont Orford | Vars | |
|---|---|---|
Vertical Drop Height from top to bottom — more is a longer, bigger mountain feeling | 540m (1,772ft) | 1,645m (5,397ft) |
Summit Elevation How high the mountain reaches — higher tends to mean colder, drier snow | 853m (2,799ft) | 2,750m (9,022ft) |
Base Elevation Height of the base village — affects snow quality at the bottom of the mountain | 313m (1,027ft) | 1,105m (3,625ft) |
Annual Snowfall Average natural snowfall per season — more means better powder odds | 533cm (210in) | 600cm (236in) |
Trail Count Total marked runs — more variety over a week-long trip | 61 | 185 |
Lift Count Total lifts — more lifts typically means shorter queues and better mountain access | 9 | 51 |
Skiable Area Total groomed and patrolled terrain in hectares | 90ha (222ac) | 940ha (2,323ac) |
Beginner Terrain Percentage of trails rated beginner — higher means more options for new skiers | 25% | 25% |
Intermediate Terrain Percentage of trails rated intermediate — the core terrain for most holiday skiers | 40% | 50% |
Advanced Terrain Percentage of trails rated advanced or expert — higher means more challenge | 35% | 25% |
Vars has a clear edge across most measurable categories. It's the stronger choice for most skiers making this comparison.
Vars has significantly more vertical — a full run takes noticeably longer and the mountain feels much bigger.
Both resorts receive similar annual snowfall — you can expect comparable snow conditions at either.
Both resorts offer a similar proportion of beginner terrain — neither has a meaningful edge for first-timers.
Vars is much larger — significantly more trails means more variety and far less chance of skiing the same run twice in a week.
Vars's higher base elevation helps snow stay cold and dry longer — better conditions through the day and into spring.
Vars wins on the stats that matter most for experienced skiers — more mountain to explore over a full week.
Both resorts offer a similar amount of beginner terrain (Mont Orford: 25%, Vars: 25%), so neither has a clear edge for first-timers. Focus on which resort offers better ski school programs and convenience for your group.
Mont Orford (533 cm/year) and Vars (600 cm/year) receive similar annual snowfall. Neither has a meaningful snow advantage — other factors like aspect, elevation, and grooming matter more day-to-day.
Vars is the larger mountain by trail count (Mont Orford: 61 trails, Vars: 185 trails). On a week-long trip, a bigger mountain means more variety and a lower chance of feeling like you've exhausted the terrain.
Mont Orford has a higher percentage of expert terrain. If you're an advanced skier who will spend most of your day on black and double-black runs, that extra challenge is worth considering when choosing between these two.
Both Mont Orford and Vars are similarly suited to families. Look at ski school quality, on-mountain kids' facilities, and accommodation proximity to lifts when making your final decision — those practical factors matter more than raw stats for a family trip.
Other matchups featuring these resorts and their regional peers.