Hoodoo vs Chapelco — Which Is Better?

Chapelco comes out ahead overall — it offers more vertical than Hoodoo. Hoodoo still has plenty to offer, especially for intermediate skiers who don't need the biggest mountain. But if you want the fuller experience, Chapelco wins this one.

Side-by-Side Stats

Highlighted cells indicate the stronger result for each metric. Numbers are measurements — compare them directly.

HoodooChapelco
Vertical Drop
Height from top to bottom — more is a longer, bigger mountain feeling
318m (1,043ft)730m (2,395ft)
Summit Elevation
How high the mountain reaches — higher tends to mean colder, drier snow
1,707m (5,600ft)1,980m (6,496ft)
Base Elevation
Height of the base village — affects snow quality at the bottom of the mountain
1,390m (4,560ft)1,250m (4,101ft)
Annual Snowfall
Average natural snowfall per season — more means better powder odds
1,016cm (400in)400cm (157in)
Trail Count
Total marked runs — more variety over a week-long trip
3428
Lift Count
Total lifts — more lifts typically means shorter queues and better mountain access
512
Skiable Area
Total groomed and patrolled terrain in hectares
324ha (801ac)140ha (346ac)
Beginner Terrain
Percentage of trails rated beginner — higher means more options for new skiers
20%25%
Intermediate Terrain
Percentage of trails rated intermediate — the core terrain for most holiday skiers
45%50%
Advanced Terrain
Percentage of trails rated advanced or expert — higher means more challenge
35%25%

Category Breakdown

These two resorts are genuinely well-matched. The best pick will come down to what matters most to you — and possibly just which flights are cheaper.

Vertical DropChapelco wins

Chapelco has significantly more vertical — a full run takes noticeably longer and the mountain feels much bigger.

Annual SnowfallHoodoo wins

Hoodoo gets substantially more snow each season — a meaningful edge for powder seekers and late-season skiing.

Beginner TerrainChapelco wins

Chapelco has a slight edge in beginner-friendly terrain, with a bit more dedicated green-run acreage.

Mountain SizeHoodoo wins

Hoodoo is noticeably larger, with more trails to explore over a multi-day trip.

Snow PreservationSimilar

Both resorts sit at similar base elevations, so snow quality and preservation are comparable.

Who Should Choose Which?

Chapelco
Beginners and families with young children

Chapelco has more dedicated beginner terrain, making it a better fit for first-timers or parents skiing with young kids.

Hoodoo
Powder chasers and late-season skiers

Hoodoo gets more snow annually — better odds of fresh powder and better conditions into late season.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for beginners — Hoodoo or Chapelco?

Chapelco is the better pick for beginners. It dedicates more of its mountain to green runs and easy terrain, which means less time hunting for appropriate slopes and more time building confidence.

Which resort gets more snow — Hoodoo or Chapelco?

Hoodoo gets more snow on average. That translates to better powder days, longer seasons, and more reliable conditions throughout January and February.

Which mountain is bigger — Hoodoo or Chapelco?

Hoodoo is the larger mountain by trail count (Hoodoo: 34 trails, Chapelco: 28 trails). On a week-long trip, a bigger mountain means more variety and a lower chance of feeling like you've exhausted the terrain.

Which has better terrain for expert skiers?

Hoodoo has a higher percentage of expert terrain. If you're an advanced skier who will spend most of your day on black and double-black runs, that extra challenge is worth considering when choosing between these two.

Which resort is better for families?

Chapelco is generally the better family resort based on its terrain mix. More beginner-friendly slopes means children and less experienced parents have plenty of room to ski without feeling pushed beyond their comfort zone. That said, both resorts have established ski schools — check current program reviews before booking.

Related Comparisons

Other matchups featuring these resorts and their regional peers.

Full Stats