Mad River Glen comes out ahead overall — it offers better snowfall than Hemsedal. Hemsedal still has plenty to offer, especially for intermediate skiers who don't need the biggest mountain. But if you want the fuller experience, Mad River Glen wins this one.
Highlighted cells indicate the stronger result for each metric. Numbers are measurements — compare them directly.
| Hemsedal | Mad River Glen | |
|---|---|---|
Vertical Drop Height from top to bottom — more is a longer, bigger mountain feeling | 790m (2,592ft) | 610m (2,001ft) |
Summit Elevation How high the mountain reaches — higher tends to mean colder, drier snow | 1,497m (4,911ft) | 1,101m (3,612ft) |
Base Elevation Height of the base village — affects snow quality at the bottom of the mountain | 680m (2,231ft) | 491m (1,611ft) |
Annual Snowfall Average natural snowfall per season — more means better powder odds | 500cm (197in) | 660cm (260in) |
Trail Count Total marked runs — more variety over a week-long trip | 53 | 53 |
Lift Count Total lifts — more lifts typically means shorter queues and better mountain access | 20 | 5 |
Skiable Area Total groomed and patrolled terrain in hectares | 290ha (717ac) | 47ha (116ac) |
Beginner Terrain Percentage of trails rated beginner — higher means more options for new skiers | 20% | 30% |
Intermediate Terrain Percentage of trails rated intermediate — the core terrain for most holiday skiers | 40% | 30% |
Advanced Terrain Percentage of trails rated advanced or expert — higher means more challenge | 40% | 40% |
Mad River Glen edges ahead in more categories, though the gap is close. Both are excellent resorts.
Hemsedal has somewhat more vertical drop, giving a slightly longer ride on most runs.
Mad River Glen gets a bit more snow on average, giving it a slight edge for powder days.
Mad River Glen has a slight edge in beginner-friendly terrain, with a bit more dedicated green-run acreage.
Both resorts are similar in size — you'll have roughly the same amount of terrain to explore.
Both resorts sit at similar base elevations, so snow quality and preservation are comparable.
Mad River Glen has more dedicated beginner terrain, making it a better fit for first-timers or parents skiing with young kids.
Mad River Glen wins on the stats that matter most for experienced skiers — more mountain to explore over a full week.
Mad River Glen gets more snow annually — better odds of fresh powder and better conditions into late season.
Mad River Glen is the better pick for beginners. It dedicates more of its mountain to green runs and easy terrain, which means less time hunting for appropriate slopes and more time building confidence.
Mad River Glen gets more snow on average. That translates to better powder days, longer seasons, and more reliable conditions throughout January and February.
Hemsedal is the larger mountain by trail count (Hemsedal: 53 trails, Mad River Glen: 53 trails). On a week-long trip, a bigger mountain means more variety and a lower chance of feeling like you've exhausted the terrain.
Both resorts offer a similar proportion of advanced terrain (Hemsedal: 40%, Mad River Glen: 40%). Expert skiers should look beyond percentages at the quality of the black runs, off-piste access, and whether there's lift-accessed backcountry terrain.
Mad River Glen is generally the better family resort based on its terrain mix. More beginner-friendly slopes means children and less experienced parents have plenty of room to ski without feeling pushed beyond their comfort zone. That said, both resorts have established ski schools — check current program reviews before booking.
Other matchups featuring these resorts and their regional peers.