Crans-Montana is the stronger all-round pick here — it offers more vertical than La Villa / Alta Badia (additional). That said, La Villa / Alta Badia (additional) is no slouch, and beginners may prefer what it offers. For most holiday skiers, Crans-Montana delivers more mountain for your trip.
Highlighted cells indicate the stronger result for each metric. Numbers are measurements — compare them directly.
| Crans-Montana | La Villa / Alta Badia (additional) | |
|---|---|---|
Vertical Drop Height from top to bottom — more is a longer, bigger mountain feeling | 1,500m (4,921ft) | 887m (2,910ft) |
Summit Elevation How high the mountain reaches — higher tends to mean colder, drier snow | 3,000m (9,843ft) | 2,087m (6,847ft) |
Base Elevation Height of the base village — affects snow quality at the bottom of the mountain | 1,500m (4,921ft) | 1,200m (3,937ft) |
Annual Snowfall Average natural snowfall per season — more means better powder odds | 400cm (157in) | 600cm (236in) |
Trail Count Total marked runs — more variety over a week-long trip | 140 | 130 |
Lift Count Total lifts — more lifts typically means shorter queues and better mountain access | 28 | 53 |
Skiable Area Total groomed and patrolled terrain in hectares | 140ha (346ac) | 130ha (321ac) |
Beginner Terrain Percentage of trails rated beginner — higher means more options for new skiers | 30% | 30% |
Intermediate Terrain Percentage of trails rated intermediate — the core terrain for most holiday skiers | 50% | 60% |
Advanced Terrain Percentage of trails rated advanced or expert — higher means more challenge | 20% | 10% |
Crans-Montana edges ahead in more categories, though the gap is close. Both are excellent resorts.
Crans-Montana has significantly more vertical — a full run takes noticeably longer and the mountain feels much bigger.
La Villa / Alta Badia (additional) gets substantially more snow each season — a meaningful edge for powder seekers and late-season skiing.
Both resorts offer a similar proportion of beginner terrain — neither has a meaningful edge for first-timers.
Both resorts are similar in size — you'll have roughly the same amount of terrain to explore.
Crans-Montana's higher base elevation helps snow stay cold and dry longer — better conditions through the day and into spring.
Crans-Montana has a comparable amount of beginner-friendly terrain and is a lower-pressure environment for new skiers.
Crans-Montana wins on the stats that matter most for experienced skiers — more mountain to explore over a full week.
La Villa / Alta Badia (additional) gets more snow annually — better odds of fresh powder and better conditions into late season.
Both resorts offer a similar amount of beginner terrain (Crans-Montana: 30%, La Villa / Alta Badia (additional): 30%), so neither has a clear edge for first-timers. Focus on which resort offers better ski school programs and convenience for your group.
La Villa / Alta Badia (additional) gets more snow on average. That translates to better powder days, longer seasons, and more reliable conditions throughout January and February.
Crans-Montana is the larger mountain by trail count (Crans-Montana: 140 trails, La Villa / Alta Badia (additional): 130 trails). On a week-long trip, a bigger mountain means more variety and a lower chance of feeling like you've exhausted the terrain.
Crans-Montana has a higher percentage of expert terrain. If you're an advanced skier who will spend most of your day on black and double-black runs, that extra challenge is worth considering when choosing between these two.
Both Crans-Montana and La Villa / Alta Badia (additional) are similarly suited to families. Look at ski school quality, on-mountain kids' facilities, and accommodation proximity to lifts when making your final decision — those practical factors matter more than raw stats for a family trip.
Other matchups featuring these resorts and their regional peers.