Andermatt-Sedrun is the stronger all-round pick here — it offers more vertical than Nevados de Chillán. That said, Nevados de Chillán is no slouch, and beginners may prefer what it offers. For most holiday skiers, Andermatt-Sedrun delivers more mountain for your trip.
Highlighted cells indicate the stronger result for each metric. Numbers are measurements — compare them directly.
| Andermatt-Sedrun | Nevados de Chillán | |
|---|---|---|
Vertical Drop Height from top to bottom — more is a longer, bigger mountain feeling | 1,480m (4,856ft) | 1,100m (3,609ft) |
Summit Elevation How high the mountain reaches — higher tends to mean colder, drier snow | 2,961m (9,715ft) | 2,700m (8,858ft) |
Base Elevation Height of the base village — affects snow quality at the bottom of the mountain | 1,444m (4,738ft) | 1,600m (5,249ft) |
Annual Snowfall Average natural snowfall per season — more means better powder odds | 700cm (276in) | 1,000cm (394in) |
Trail Count Total marked runs — more variety over a week-long trip | 120 | 32 |
Lift Count Total lifts — more lifts typically means shorter queues and better mountain access | 33 | 9 |
Skiable Area Total groomed and patrolled terrain in hectares | 1,500ha (3,707ac) | 12,000ha (29,653ac) |
Beginner Terrain Percentage of trails rated beginner — higher means more options for new skiers | 25% | 25% |
Intermediate Terrain Percentage of trails rated intermediate — the core terrain for most holiday skiers | 50% | 50% |
Advanced Terrain Percentage of trails rated advanced or expert — higher means more challenge | 25% | 25% |
Andermatt-Sedrun edges ahead in more categories, though the gap is close. Both are excellent resorts.
Andermatt-Sedrun has somewhat more vertical drop, giving a slightly longer ride on most runs.
Nevados de Chillán gets a bit more snow on average, giving it a slight edge for powder days.
Both resorts offer a similar proportion of beginner terrain — neither has a meaningful edge for first-timers.
Andermatt-Sedrun is much larger — significantly more trails means more variety and far less chance of skiing the same run twice in a week.
Both resorts sit at similar base elevations, so snow quality and preservation are comparable.
Andermatt-Sedrun has a comparable amount of beginner-friendly terrain and is a lower-pressure environment for new skiers.
Andermatt-Sedrun wins on the stats that matter most for experienced skiers — more mountain to explore over a full week.
Nevados de Chillán gets more snow annually — better odds of fresh powder and better conditions into late season.
Both resorts offer a similar amount of beginner terrain (Andermatt-Sedrun: 25%, Nevados de Chillán: 25%), so neither has a clear edge for first-timers. Focus on which resort offers better ski school programs and convenience for your group.
Nevados de Chillán gets more snow on average. That translates to better powder days, longer seasons, and more reliable conditions throughout January and February.
Andermatt-Sedrun is the larger mountain by trail count (Andermatt-Sedrun: 120 trails, Nevados de Chillán: 32 trails). On a week-long trip, a bigger mountain means more variety and a lower chance of feeling like you've exhausted the terrain.
Both resorts offer a similar proportion of advanced terrain (Andermatt-Sedrun: 25%, Nevados de Chillán: 25%). Expert skiers should look beyond percentages at the quality of the black runs, off-piste access, and whether there's lift-accessed backcountry terrain.
Both Andermatt-Sedrun and Nevados de Chillán are similarly suited to families. Look at ski school quality, on-mountain kids' facilities, and accommodation proximity to lifts when making your final decision — those practical factors matter more than raw stats for a family trip.
Other matchups featuring these resorts and their regional peers.